All Kinds of Rocks, Fossils

Cluster Perfect

On Energy, Mass, Gravity, Galaxies Clusters, AND Life

 

On Energy, Mass, Gravity, Galaxies Clusters, AND Life

A Commonsensible Recapitulation

 

A. "Heavyweight galaxies in the young universe", at

http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/42419/title/Heavyweight_galaxies_in_the_young_universe

New observations of full-grown galaxies in the young universe may force astrophysicists to revise their leading theory of galaxy formation, at least as it applies to regions where galaxies congregate into clusters.

 

B. Some brief notes in "Light On Dark Matter?", at

http://www.physforum.com/index.php?showtopic=22994&st=0&#entry373127

- "Galaxy Clusters Evolved By Dispersion, Not By Conglomeration"

- Introduction of E=Total[m(1 + D)]

- "Dark Energy And Matter And The Emperor's New Clothes"

- "Evolutionary Cosmology: Ordained Or Random"

- "“Movie” Of Microwave Pulse Transitioning From Quantum To Classical Physics"

- "Broken Symmetry" Is Physics' Term Of Biology's "Evolution"

- "A Glimpse Of Forces-Matter-Life Unified Theory"

 

C. Commonsensible conception of gravity

1. According to the standard model, which describes all the forces in nature except gravity, all elementary particles were born massless. Interactions with the proposed Higgs field would slow down some of the particles and endow them with mass. Finding the Higgs — or proving it does not exist — has therefore become one of the most important quests in particle physics.

However, for a commonsensible primitive mind with a commonsensible universe represented by

E=Total[m(1 + D)],

this conceptual equation describes gravity. It does not explain gravity. It describes it. It applies to the whole universe and to every and all specific cases, regardless of size.

2. Thus gravity is simply another face of the total cosmic energy. Thus gravity is THE cosmic parent of phenomena such as black holes and life. It is the display of THE all-pervasive-embracive strained space texture, laid down by the expanding galactic clusters, also noticed within the galactic clusters in the energy backlashes into various constructs of temporary constrained energy packages.

3. "Extrapolation of the expansion of the universe backwards in time to the early hot dense "Big Bang" phase, using general relativity, yields an infinite density and temperature at a finite time in the past. At age 10^-35 seconds the Universe begins with a cataclysm that generates space and time, as well as all the matter and energy the Universe will ever hold."

At D=0, E was = m and both E and m were, together, all the energy and matter the Universe will ever hold. Since the onset of the cataclysm, E remains constant and m diminishes as D increases.

The increase of D is the inflation, followed by expansion, of what became the galactic clusters.

At 10^-35 seconds, D in E=Total[m(1 + D)] was already a fraction of a second above zero. This is when gravity started. This is what started gravity. At this instance starts the space texture, starts the straining of the space texture, and starts the "space texture memory", gravity, that may eventually overcome expansion and initiate re-impansion back to singularity.

 

D. Commonsensible conception of the forces other than gravity

The forces other than gravity are, commonsensibly, forces involved in conjunction with evolution within the galactic clusters:

http://royalsociety.org/downloaddoc.asp?id=4770

The farthest we go in reductionism in Everything, including in Life, we shall still end up with wholism, until we arrive at energy. Energy is the base element of everything and of all in the universe. At the beginning was the energy singularity, at the end will be near zero mass and an infinite dispersion of the beginning energy, and in-between, the universe undergoes continuous evolution consisting of myriad energy-to-energy and energy-to-mass-to-energy transformations.

The universe, and everything in it, are continuously evolving, and all the evolutions are intertwined.

 

E. PS to "On Cosmic Energy And Mass Evolutions"

As mass is just another face of energy it is commonsensible to regard not only life, but mass in general, as a format of temporarily constrained energy.

It therefore ensues that whereas the expanding cosmic constructs, the galaxies clusters, are - overall - continuously converting "their" original pre-inflation mass back to energy, the overall evolution WITHIN them, within the clusters, is in the opposite direction, temporarily constrained energy packages such as black holes and biospheres and other energy-storing mass-formats are precariuosly forming and "doing best" to survive as long as "possible"...

 

F. From "Strings Link the Ultracold with the Superhot"

http://www.sciencenews.org/view/feature/id/42632/title/Strings_Link_the_Ultracold_with_the_Superhot

"Perfect liquids suggest theory’s math mirrors something real.

When the universe was very young, and still superhot from the aftermath of the Big Bang, plasma should have been the only state of matter around. And that’s what scientists at Brookhaven expected to see when they smashed gold ions together at 99.99 percent of the speed of light using a machine called RHIC (for Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider). RHIC physicists thought the ion collisions would melt the gold’s protons and neutrons into a hot plasma of quarks and gluons at a temperature of a trillion kelvins, replicating conditions similar to those a microsecond after the birth of the universe. But instead of a gaslike plasma, the physicists reported in 2005, RHIC served up a hot quark soup, behaving more like a liquid than a plasma or gas."

 

G. The expectation of Brookhaven scientists was a bit unrealistic

The "aftermath of the Big Bang" lasted much less than 10^-35 seconds. This is evidenced by the fact that "Gravity Is THE Manifestation Of The Onset Of Cosmic Inflation Cataclysm":

http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/184.page#1950

and

http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/184.page#1982

With all respect due to the scientists at Brookhaven it is unrealistic to expect that they can recreate the state of pre big-bang energy-mass singularity. Commonsense is still the best scientific approach.

 

H. PS To "Gravity Limits Link Ultracold And Superhot": Our Inability To Create Singularity

a. From "Strings Link the Ultracold with the Superhot"

A new truth always has to contend with many difficulties,” the German physicist Max Planck said decades ago. “If it were not so, it would have been discovered much sooner.”

b. IMO gravity is attempted reversal of inflation

To me, a simple uninformed one, E=mc^2 is a derived formula, whereas

 E=Total[m(1 + D)] is a commonsensical descriptive concept.

I intuitively regard both the ultracold and superhot liquids as being in a confined space and "striving but unable" to overcome D, to render D=0.

I also intuitively regard our accelerated collisions smashups as attempted "reverse inflations" in the sense that Newton's law of universal gravitation seems to me as "reverse inflation".

 

Dov Henis

(Comments From The 22nd Century)

Life's Manifest

http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/112.page#578

EVOLUTION Beyond Darwin 200

http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/100/122.page#1407

 

About the Author

Networking Your Way to the Perfect Job

For a lot of job seekers, networking is one of the hardest concepts to grasp. They see it as asking for favors, and they’d rather find opportunities themselves than ask their contacts for help. Just like you need to reconceptualize your job search to find the area where you can add the most value, you need to reconceptualize your understanding of networking.

The key insight is that networking isn't about asking for favors. It's about looking for opportunities to add value in the places where it's needed most. Creating a network isn't about looking for what others can do for you and creating bonds based on that self-interest. Networking is about building relationships with good will. I don’t mean phony relationships – what we’re talking about is real relationships that grow because you help people who just happen to be able to help you. When it's done right, networking is built on win-win partnerships.

Effective networking can only happen when you put yourself out there for others. Until you do that, people won’t be willing to put themselves out there for you. Start with a listening ear, and try to develop an awareness of what problems people face. Put the nagging thought of “what is this going to do for me” out of your mind. Forget about the end result, and focus on adding value. If you do this for people, they’ll notice. People like to help people who help people. Either they, or someone in their network, will do the same for you.

Something else to remember is that when it comes to people helping you out, it's not always about what they can do for you. Often, they’ll help by connecting you with someone in their network who can help you more. Think of a network as a spider web. It doesn't just cluster in one spot – it spins off in multiple directions, and connects in lots of different places. When it comes to networks of people, those strands are relationships. By spinning a bigger networking web, you will be connected to all of your connections' connections.

Going to a networking cocktail, giving out your business card and collecting cards from others is not networking. Those business cards only mean something if the people have a reason to take your call. That usually happens after you’ve added value, and to add real value, you’ve got to genuinely care. Forget about the seemingly transactional nature of most business relationships, and remember that helping people now will make them more willing to help you in the future.

Being a good listener will get you far in your career search. You can't add value if you don't even know what the person needs. If you listen well while you're networking, you'll be able to pick up on lots of cues and opportunities to add value to potential employers. For example, if someone mentions that they've been shortening their lunch break for the past few weeks to catch up on paperwork, try and think of a solution for them. You could only have found out that this person needs value added in this area by talking – and listening – to them long enough for the conversation to get to that point. The more you listen, the more people will reveal, and the more they reveal, the more opportunities you’ll see.

Talking less is an important part of the process, too. Too many people think networking is all about telling everyone in the room what they are looking for, and hoping that one of the people will hook on and help them out. Approach people the opposite way. Instead of looking for how they can help you immediately, look for how you can help them first. The saying is “what goes around comes around”, not “what comes around goes around!”

Networking is an incremental and ongoing process – in other words, it takes time. It takes patience, but sooner or later favors are returned. The more you help people, the more they'll remember you. The more they remember you, the more opportunities they'll think of to add value to you.

About the Author

Danny Iny is a ten-year entrepreneur and strategic communications expert. He has won awards for innovative business planning, and is the published author of a book called “Ordinary Miracles", which has a five-star rating on Amazon.com. He has sat on both sides of the job interview table, and has helped many people solve problems at work and find fulfilling employment.